Find the latest Class Action Lawsuits and Settlements here that has no proof of purchase requirement!
In this post, we will list out all of the Best Class Action Lawsuit Settlements that require no proof of purchase, receipts, etc.
Please remember to submit your claim ONLY if you qualify for settlement funds to receive free coupons, cash payments, and other means of reimbursement.
When submitting a claim, you are then eligible for cash payment as compensation whenever a company has decided to settle a class action lawsuit.
In order to submit a claim, you must fill out and file a claim form to receive compensation. Apply for these class action lawsuits and claim your settlement funds if you qualify.
Editor’s Note: Make sure you qualify for the class action lawsuit before you file a claim. For a full list of class action lawsuits, see our post on the top class action lawsuits.
*CAL is another way that we refer to Class Action Lawsuits*
How to File Claim for Class Action Lawsuits
- Step One: Find Products You Purchased
- Take a look of our list to find open settlements for products you may have purchased. Find out what the estimated payout will be and if proof of purchase is needed. Figure out if it’s worth your time to follow through. Most no receipts needed can be a few minutes of your time.
- Step Two: Fill Out the Claim Form
- Click through to the settlement claim form and fill out online. Simply provide the necessary info such as your name and address, products information you purchased, and then submit your claim.
- Step Three: Get your Check in the Mail
- They will mail your check once to the address your provided once your claim has been approved. Most claims checks are mailed 1-2 months after the claims period closes.
No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements
Xcel Energy, e-Prime Energy Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers and companies who purchased natural gas from e-Prime Energy Marketing Inc. or Xcel Energy Inc. in Colorado from Jan. 1, 2000, to Oct. 31, 2002. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Xcel Energy, e-Prime Energy Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: August 18, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers and companies who purchased natural gas from e-Prime Energy Marketing Inc. or Xcel Energy Inc. in Colorado from Jan. 1, 2000, to Oct. 31, 2002.
- Case Name & Number: Breckenridge Brewery of Colorado, LLC, et al. v. ONEOK, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:06-01110-REB-MEH, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
See Xcel Energy, e-Prime Energy Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Intero Real Estate Services Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received two or more phone calls promoting Intero Real Estate Services within a 12-month period despite having their number registered on the National Do Not Call Registry between Sept. 13, 2014, and Dec. 19, 2019. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Intero Real Estate Services Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 7, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who received two or more phone calls promoting Intero Real Estate Services within a 12-month period despite having their number registered on the National Do Not Call Registry between Sept. 13, 2014, and Dec. 19, 2019. Eligible calls were made by certain Intero agents using the Mojo dialing service. Intero identified 37,962 phone numbers that received a total of 171,584 call attempts.
- Case Name & Number: Mitchell, et al. v. Intero Real Estate Services, Case No. 5:18-cv-05623-BLF, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Intero Real Estate Services Unsolicited Calls Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
First Interstate Bank Unfair Fees Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits First Interstate Bank customers who were, between Dec. 30, 2011, and April 7, 2021, charged one or more overdraft fees on a debit card transaction in which there was a sufficient balance available at the time the transaction was authorized but an insufficient balance at the time the transaction was posted. You may be eligible for a potential award from the First Interstate Bank Unfair Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: June 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits First Interstate Bank customers who were, between Dec. 30, 2011, and April 7, 2021, charged one or more overdraft fees on a debit card transaction in which there was a sufficient balance available at the time the transaction was authorized but an insufficient balance at the time the transaction was posted. Consumers included in the settlement should have received an email or postcard notice about their eligibility.
- Case Name & Number:
- Morris v. First Interstate Bank, Case No. DV 20-528, in the Yellowstone County Circuit Court Montana
- Miller v. First Interstate Bank, No. CV-21-45-BLG-SPW-TJC, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana
See First Interstate Bank Unfair Fees Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
MOGA Logistics Worker Misclassification, Wage Violations Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who were employed by MOGA Logistics as a trucker between Dec. 4, 2015, and Dec. 4, 2019. You may be eligible for a potential award from the MOGA Logistics Worker Misclassification, Wage Violations Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: June 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who were employed by MOGA Logistics as a trucker between Dec. 4, 2015, and Dec. 4, 2019.
- Case Name & Number: ROBERT L. BURTON, JR., et al. v. MOGA LOGISTICS INC. and HARWINDER SINGH, Case No. SCV-265985, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sonoma
See MOGA Logistics Worker Misclassification, Wage Violations Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received a fax advertisement from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers between July 14, 2009, and June 9, 2010. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 26, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The FTB settlement benefits LLCs that paid an LLC tax fee based on their worldwide total income previously required under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 17942. Eligible LLCs must have submitted a refund request that was either denied or denied with the opportunity to file a lawsuit under California tax code by Feb. 4, 2010.
- Case Name & Number: Cin-Q Automobiles, Inc., v. Buccaneers Limited Partnership, Case No. 8:13-cv-01592-AEP, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Tampa Division
See Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
On Point Global Fraudulent Websites FTC Judgment Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits purchased a guide from On Point Global in 2017, 2018 or 2019 and you were not satisfied with their purchase. You may be eligible for a potential award from the On Point Global Fraudulent Websites FTC Judgment Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 17, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Consumers are eligible for this judgment if they purchased a guide from On Point Global in 2017, 2018 or 2019 and you were not satisfied with their purchase or if they provided their personal information to On Point Global in 2019 and were not satisfied with their experience.
- Case Name & Number: Federal Trade Commission v. On Point Global LLC, et al., Case No. 19-CV-25046-SCOLA in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
See On Point Global Fraudulent Websites FTC Judgment Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Costco 401(k) Mismanagement Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits all participants, beneficiaries, and alternate payees of the Costco 401(k) Retirement Plan who have a plan account as of the date the settlement class is certified by the court or who do not have a plan account as of that date and had a plan account on or after the last business day of a month on and after May 30, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Costco 401(k) Mismanagement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 1, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits all participants, beneficiaries, and alternate payees of the Costco 401(k) Retirement Plan who have a plan account as of the date the settlement class is certified by the court or who do not have a plan account as of that date and had a plan account on or after the last business day of a month on and after May 30, 2014, provided such an account attained a balance in excess of $1,000 for at least 12 months beginning on and after May 30, 2014. The class period is from May 30, 2014, through March 17, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Soulek v. Costco Wholesale Corp., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00937, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
See Costco 401(k) Mismanagement Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Central Payment Co. Improper Fees Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former Central Payment customers who, between Jan. 1, 2010, and Oct. 31, 2020, were assessed the TSSNF and PCI noncompliance fees; had their contractual credit card discount rates increased above their contractual rate by the company; and for whom the company shifted their credit card transactions from lower-cost rate tiers to higher-cost tiers. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Central Payment Co. Improper Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: August 6, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The class is made up of current and former Central Payment customers who, between Jan. 1, 2010, and Oct. 31, 2020, were assessed the TSSNF and PCI noncompliance fees; had their contractual credit card discount rates increased above their contractual rate by the company; and for whom the company shifted their credit card transactions from lower-cost rate tiers to higher-cost tiers.
- Case Name & Number: Custom Hair Designs by Sandy, LLC, et al. v. Central Payment Co., LLC, Case No. 8:17-cv-00310-JFB-CPZ, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
See Central Payment Co. Improper Fees Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible:The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. The settlement covers milk, ice cream, butter, yogurt and other dairy products from both Fairlife and Fair Oak Farms. A full list of included products is available on the settlement website.
- Case Name & Number: In re fairlife Milk Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2909, Lead Case No. 1:19-cv-03924-RMD-MDW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
See Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Uber Driver Misclassification Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits Californians who used the Uber app as a driver between Feb. 28, 2019, and Dec. 16, 2020, or the Uber Eats app as a driver between June 28, 2016, and Oct. 7, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Uber Driver Misclassification Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: June 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Californians who used the Uber app as a driver between Feb. 28, 2019, and Dec. 16, 2020, or the Uber Eats app as a driver between June 28, 2016, and Oct. 7, 2021.
- Class Members are only eligible if they opted out of Uber’s arbitration clause.
- Case Name & Number: James, et al. v. Uber Technologies Inc., Case No. 3:19-CV-06462-EMC in the U.S. District Court Northern District of California
See Uber Driver Misclassification Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
American Credit Acceptance Improper Car Repossession Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received written notice from American Credit Acceptance of the pending sale or disposal of their repossessed or surrendered vehicles between Dec. 2, 2015, and Feb. 11, 2021, whose vehicles were later sold, and who were charged a deficiency balance on their accounts. You may be eligible for a potential award from the American Credit Acceptance Improper Car Repossession Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 28, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who received written notice from American Credit Acceptance of the pending sale or disposal of their repossessed or surrendered vehicles between Dec. 2, 2015, and Feb. 11, 2021, whose vehicles were later sold, and who were charged a deficiency balance on their accounts.
- Case Name & Number: Jay Sherrard, et al. v. American Credit Acceptance LLC, Case No. 19STCV43101 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court
See American Credit Acceptance Improper Car Repossession Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Neutrogena, Aveeno Sunscreen Carcinogens Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased certain Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products between May 26, 2015, and April 8, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Neutrogena, Aveeno Sunscreen Carcinogens Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 7, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased certain Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products between May 26, 2015, and April 8, 2022. Products covered by the settlement are:
- Neutrogena Beach Defense Aerosol Sunscreen
- Neutrogena Cool Dry Sport Aerosol Sunscreen
- Neutrogena Invisible Daily Defense Aerosol Sunscreen
- Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Aerosol Sunscreen
- Aveeno Protect + Refresh Aerosol Sunscreen
- Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Water Resistant Sunscreen Lotion
- Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Face Sunscreen Lotion
- Aveeno Baby Continuous Protection Sensitive Skin Sunscreen Lotion
- Case Name & Number: Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-06622, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
See Neutrogena, Aveeno Sunscreen Carcinogens Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Vending Machines Fingerprint Collection Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who used one of Compass’ or 365 Retail’s Illinois vending systems between Aug. 23, 2014, and Nov. 2, 2021. Eligible vending systems were operated under names like Smart Market, Avenue C, Market Now, eMart, NEX Micro Markets, and Honest Eats Marketplace. The kiosks were placed in canteens, break rooms, and food service areas and allowed people to purchase food or drinks. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vending Machines Fingerprint Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: July 29, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who used one of Compass’ or 365 Retail’s Illinois vending systems between Aug. 23, 2014, and Nov. 2, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-06622, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
See Vending Machines Fingerprint Collection Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Think Finance Unfair Lending Practices Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who had loans with Great Plains Lending at any time, loans with Plain Green before June 1, 2016, or cash advances on lines of credit from MobiLoans before May 6, 2017. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Think Finance Unfair Lending Practices Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: June 24, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who had loans with Great Plains Lending at any time, loans with Plain Green before June 1, 2016, or cash advances on lines of credit from MobiLoans before May 6, 2017.
- Case Name & Number: Gibbs v. Elevate, Case No. 3:20-cv-632; Gibbs v. Stinson, Case No. 3:18-cv-676; Brice v. Stinson, Case No. 3:19-cv-1481; in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
See Think Finance Unfair Lending Practices Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. Class periods vary depending on the state a Class Member worked in, as follows:
- For Class Members employed in Wyoming: Oct. 21, 2010, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Indiana, Ohio, Washington, Minnesota, Vermont, New York, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin and Colorado: Oct. 21, 2014, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Missouri: Oct. 21, 2015, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in California, Pennsylvania and Utah: Oct. 21, 2016, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in New Hampshire: Oct. 21, 2017, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members not employed in one of the above identified states: Oct. 21, 2016 to Oct. 23, 2021
- Case Name & Number: Hamilton v. Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership, Case No. SC20210148, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of El Dorado
See Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 31, 2024 (estimated)
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions.
- Case Name & Number: Adam X. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, Case No. 3:17-cv-00188-FLW-LHG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Rodan + Fields Lash Boost between Oct. 1, 2016, and March 11, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 7, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Rodan + Fields Lash Boost between Oct. 1, 2016, and March 11, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Scherr v. Rodan & Fields, Case No. CIVDS 1723435, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
See Rodan + Fields Lash Boost Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Activision Blizzard Harassment, Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former employees who worked for Activision Blizzard Inc., Blizzard Entertainment Inc., Activision Publishing Inc., King.Com Inc, or any of their subsidiaries between Sept.1 , 2016, and March 29, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Activision Blizzard Harassment, Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: August 13, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits current and former employees who worked for Activision Blizzard Inc., Blizzard Entertainment Inc., Activision Publishing Inc., King.Com Inc, or any of their subsidiaries between Sept.1 , 2016 and March 29, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al., Case. No. 2:21-CV07682-DSF-JEM, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
See Activision Blizzard Harassment, Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Chicken of the Sea Tuna Price Fixing Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit indirect purchasers of Chicken of the Sea tuna products who purchased the products in certain states and territories between June 1, 2011, and July 1, 2015. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Chicken of the Sea Tuna Price Fixing Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: August 22, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits indirect purchasers of Chicken of the Sea tuna products who purchased the products in certain states and territories between June 1, 2011, and July 1, 2015. Eligible products may have been packaged in cans or pouches smaller than 40 ounces.
- Case Name & Number: In Re: Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 15-MD-2670 DMS (MDD), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
See Chicken of the Sea Tuna Price Fixing Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit
For Washington residents who got charged a tenant screening fee or holding fee by FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, then you are eligible for a potential award from the FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Class Members are Washington state residents who sent in a rental application to FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, and paid a tenant screening fee through FPI to the owner of the property, paid a holding deposit through FPI to the property owner, or had a credit report pulled by FPI or another entity acting on its behalf.
- Case Name & Number: Brianna Morris v. FPI Management Inc., Case. No. 2:19-CV-00128-TOR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
See FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit
For every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015
- Case Name & Number: Woznicki v. Raydon Corporation et al., Case No. 6:18-cv-02090-WWB-GJK, in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division
See Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone in the United States, its territories, and districts who purchased certain McCormick all-natural products between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021. You are eligible for a potential award from the McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 90 days after the settlement receives final approval
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who purchased certain McCormick products labeled as “natural” or “all natural” between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Holve, et al. v. Mccormick & Co. Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-06702 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
See McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999. You may be eligible for a potential award from the USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999, subject to certain important exclusions. The estates of deceased individuals who would have been Class Members also are considered part of the Class.
- Case Name & Number: Spegele, et al. v. USAA Life Insurance Co., Case No. 5:17-cv-967-OLG in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
See USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Duke University and UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all natural persons employed as a faculty member by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: All natural persons employed by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018, as a faculty member.
- Case Name & Number: Binotti, et al. v. Duke University, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-470 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020:
- NeuroSONIC Superfruit Infusion
- NeuroSONIC Orange Passion
- NeuroBLISS White Raspberry
- NeuroBLISS Citrus Berry
- NeuroBLISS Tropical Lychee
- NeuroPROTEIN Watermelon Mint
- NeuroPROTEIN Cherry Vanilla
- NeuroDAILY Tangerine Citrus
- NeuroGASM Passion Fruit
- Case Name & Number: Young, et al. v. Neurobrands LLC, Case No. 4:18-cv-05907-JSW in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible:
- The Class is defined as anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021, or as an hourly call center worker in a brick-and-mortar call center, including, but not limited to agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Jan. 27, 2017, and June 21, 2021.
- The settlement definition of “At-Home Workers” does not include call center workers who work or worked from home temporarily or permanently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the settlement’s definition of “Brick-And-Mortar Workers” does include call center workers who worked from home temporarily or permanently due to COVID-19.
- Case Name & Number: Jasmine C., et al. v. Intelenet America LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-14052-MCA-JAD in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020
- Case Name & Number: Dianne S., et al. v. Robert Heath Trucking Inc., Case No. 19STCV30808 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
See Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021 (the Class Period), including any beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the plan at any time during that period and any alternate payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the plan at any point during that period.
- Case Name & Number: Buescher et. al v. Brenntag, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00147-JMG in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
See Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from January 21, 2014, through October 20, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from Jan. 21, 2014, through Oct. 20, 2014, and whose plan accounts included investments in the IBM Stock Fund.
- Case Name & Number: Larry J., et al. v. Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-03781-WHP in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
See IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all residents of the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: none
- Who’s Eligible: Two classes
- TILA Class: Anyone in the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions within one year prior to the filing of the initial complaint.
- Breach of Contract Class: Anyone in the United States who, during the Class Period, entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions.
- Case Name & Number: Alejandro Carrillo, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
See Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit
For current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020, you are eligible for a potential award from the Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Hector S., et al. v. Creative Ceilings Inc., et al., Case No. MSC19-02678 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa
See Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit
For individuals who were former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama who own a Terminix-serviced property, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: There is no claim form deadline; however, the settlement fund will expire 12/01/2022.
- Who’s Eligible: Former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama
- Case Name & Number: State of Alabama v. The Terminix International Co. LP, et al., Case No. CV-2020-901368 in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama
See Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
For homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus, you are eligible for a potential award from the Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus between the applicable dates in each state.
- Case Name & Number: Koepplinger v. Seterus Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00995 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit
If you signed up for a 401(k) plan with Trojan Horse from Jan. 1, 2011 through Sept. 20, 2016 and fear that you and your loved ones may be taken advantage of, you are eligible for a potential award from the Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit.
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Estimated Amount: Varies
- Case Name & Number: Longo, et al. v. Trojan Horse Ltd., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00418-BO, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
See our Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review .
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit
For individuals that purchased a timeshare from Resort Sales Missouri Inc. or Spinnaker Resorts Inc on or after June 1, 2014, you are eligible for a potential award.
- Claim Form Deadline: The deadline to file a claim is 30 days after receiving a notice in the mail
- Estimated Amount: Varies, depending on the closing costs paid.
- Case Name & Number: Darrell and Kathleen Thompson v. Resort Sales Missouri Inc. and Spinnaker Resorts Inc., Case No. 1746-CC00203, in the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri
See our Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit Review
(Click the link above to file your claim)
 |
Bottom Line
If you qualify for any of these class action lawsuit settlements, this is a great way to earn some extra cash and become reimbursed.
There are many class action lawsuit settlements available up to date, but these are generally available to the public and require no proof of purchase.
If you’re interested in more class action lawsuit settlements, see our full list of the Review.
Did you know you can earn free money from banks? Below are a few of the best banks offering the best bonuses:
- Huntington Bank Promotions
- Chase Bank Promotions
- TD Bank Promotions
- Discover Bank Promotions
- HSBC Bank Promotions
- CIT Bank Promotions
- For more of a variety, see our list of 1,000+ bank bonuses!
