Find the latest Class Action Lawsuits and Settlements here that has no proof of purchase requirement!
In this post, we will list out all of the Best Class Action Lawsuit Settlements that require no proof of purchase, receipts, etc.
Please remember to submit your claim ONLY if you qualify for settlement funds to receive free coupons, cash payments, and other means of reimbursement.
When submitting a claim, you are then eligible for cash payment as compensation whenever a company has decided to settle a class action lawsuit.
In order to submit a claim, you must fill out and file a claim form to receive compensation. Apply for these class action lawsuits and claim your settlement funds if you qualify.
Editor’s Note: Make sure you qualify for the class action lawsuit before you file a claim. For a full list of class action lawsuits, see our post on the best class action lawsuits.
*CAL is another way that we refer to Class Action Lawsuits*
How to File Claim for Class Action Lawsuits
- Step One: Find Products You Purchased
- Take a look of our list to find open settlements for products you may have purchased. Find out what the estimated payout will be and if proof of purchase is needed. Figure out if it’s worth your time to follow through. Most no receipts needed can be a few minutes of your time.
- Step Two: Fill Out the Claim Form
- Click through to the settlement claim form and fill out online. Simply provide the necessary info such as your name and address, products information you purchased, and then submit your claim.
- Step Three: Get your Check in the Mail
- They will mail your check once to the address your provided once your claim has been approved. Most claims checks are mailed 1-2 months after the claims period closes.
Table of Contents
- 1 No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements
- 1.1 Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.2 Zynga Gambling App Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.3 PALMco Power Overcharges Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.4 AspenPointe Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.5 TransUnion OFAC Database Information Sale Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.6 Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.7 TCL TV Refresh Rate False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.8 Philadelphia Excess Foreclosure Sale Funds Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.9 Costco COBRA Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.10 McAlister’s Deli of Orland Park Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.11 Shake Shack Employee Schedules Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.12 U.S. Polo Association Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.13 Genesis Building Services, Eat My Dust Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.14 PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.15 Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.16 Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.17 Carnagio McDonald’s Employee Finger Scan Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.18 Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.19 Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.20 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.21 Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.22 Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.23 New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.24 FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.25 Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.26 McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.27 USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.28 Duke University and UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.29 Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.30 Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.31 Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.32 Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.33 IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.34 Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.35 Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.36 Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.37 Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.38 Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit
- 1.39 Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit
- 2 Bottom Line
No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements
Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased any Ritas products (margarita products, spritzers and more) between Jan. 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 16, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased any Ritas products (margarita products, spritzers and more) between Jan. 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022. A full list of included products is available on the settlement website.
- Case Name & Number: Browning, et al., v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-00889-SRB, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
See Anheuser-Busch Ritas False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Zynga Gambling App Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who played Hit It Rich!, Black Diamond Casino, Game of Thrones Slots, Wizard of Oz Slots and/or Willy Wonka Slots in the state of Washington before June 28, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Zynga Gambling Apps Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 25, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who played Hit It Rich!, Black Diamond Casino, Game of Thrones Slots, Wizard of Oz Slots and/or Willy Wonka Slots in the state of Washington before June 28, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Ferrando et al. v. Zynga Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00214-RSL in the District Court for the Western District of Washington
See Zynga Gambling App Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
PALMco Power Overcharges Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who enrolled with PALMco to receive electricity at a Massachusetts property between Aug. 1, 2014 and Sept. 13, 2017 and who were charged an variable electricity rate. You may be eligible for a potential award from the PALMco Power Overcharges Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 19, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who enrolled with PALMco to receive electricity at a Massachusetts property between 08/01/2014 – 09/13/2017 and charged an variable electricity rate
- Case Name & Number: Lindsay Dill v. PALMco Energy MA LLC, Case No. 1:13-cv-10764-DPW in the District Court for the District of Massachusetts
See PALMco Power Overcharges Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
AspenPointe Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers whose full names and other identifiers or health information was compromised in the AspenPointe data breach between Sept. 12 and 22, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the AspenPointe Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 18, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Consumers whose full names and other identifiers or health information was compromised in the AspenPointe data breach between 09/12/2020 – 09/22/2020
- Case Name & Number: Hall et al. v. AspenPointe, Inc., Case No. 2020CV32175 in the 4th District Court, County Of El Paso, State Of Colorado
See AspenPointe Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
TransUnion OFAC Database Information Sale Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits benefits people to whom TransUnion sent a letter regarding OFAC database information between Jan. 1 and July 26, 2011. You may be eligible for a potential award from the TransUnion OFAC Database Information Sale Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 17, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits people to whom TransUnion sent a letter regarding OFAC database information between Jan. 1 and July 26, 2011. This class includes two subclasses. The stipulation subclass includes 1,853 class members who TransUnion identified in a pre-trial stipulation as those who had a credit report regarding OFAC list information shared with a third party. The 6,332 class members in the non-stipulation subclass may have had the same information disclosed, but this was not proven in the pre-trial stipulation.
- Case Name & Number: Ramirez v. Trans Union LLC, Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC in the District Court, Northern District of California
See TransUnion OFAC Database Information Sale Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake products between April 27, 2017, and July 29, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 11, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake products between April 27, 2017, and July 29, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Grayer v. Sara Lee Frozen Bakery, LLC, Case No. 2022LA000002, filed in the 3rd Judicial Circuit of Madison County, Illinois
See Sara Lee All Butter Pound Cake False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
TCL TV Refresh Rate False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who purchased a new TCL TV in California between April 24, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the TCL TV Refresh Rate False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 7, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who purchased a new TCL TV in California between April 24, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2021. TVs included under the TCL settlement must have been marketed as having a refresh rate twice as high as its native panel refresh rate.
- Case Name & Number: Christopher Julian, et al. v. TTE Technology, Inc. dba TCL North America, Case No. 3:20-CV-02857 in the District Court for the Northern District of California
See TCL TV Refresh Rate False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Philadelphia Excess Foreclosure Sale Funds Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who owned property in Philadelphia that was foreclosed and sold in a sheriff sale by the city to their mortgage issuer or other executing creditor. Class members are eligible for the settlement if the winning bid on the property was greater than mortgages or liens settled after the sale. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Philadelphia Excess Foreclosure Sale Funds Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: October 7, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who owned property in Philadelphia that was foreclosed and sold in a sheriff sale by the city to their mortgage issuer or other executing creditor. Class members are eligible for the settlement if the winning bid on the property was greater than mortgages or liens settled after the sale.
- Case Name & Number: Butterline v. City of Philadelphia, Case No. 2:15-cv-01429-JS, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
See Philadelphia Excess Foreclosure Sale Funds Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Costco COBRA Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits participants and beneficiaries in the Costco Employee Benefits Program who were sent the COBRA notice by or on behalf of Costco at any point between June 9, 2018, and June 9, 2021, and did not elect COBRA coverage. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Costco COBRA Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: Class members include all participants and beneficiaries in the Costco Employee Benefits Program who were sent the COBRA notice by or on behalf of Costco at any point between June 9, 2018, and June 9, 2021, and did not elect COBRA coverage. Court documents estimate the class to consist of around 38,818 members.
- Case Name & Number: John G. Baja v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Case No. 0:21-cv-61210-SINGHAL/VALLE, in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division
See Costco COBRA Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
McAlister’s Deli of Orland Park Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits current and former McAlister’s Deli Orland Park employees in Illinois who used a fingerprint scan time clock to clock in and out of work between Dec. 3, 2015, and June 27, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the McAlister’s Deli of Orland Park Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits current and former McAlister’s Deli Orland Park employees in Illinois who used a fingerprint scan time clock to clock in and out of work between Dec. 3, 2015, and June 27, 2022. This does not include Orland Park employees who previously released their BIPA claims as part of another settlement. There are 165 people that fall under this definition.
- Case Name & Number: Bertasiute v. Orland Park Deli, Inc. d/b/a McAlister’s of Orland Park, Case No. 2020-CH-07055, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division
See McAlister’s Deli of Orland Park Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Shake Shack Employee Schedules Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits hourly employees who worked at New York City Shake Shack restaurants between Jan. 1, 2019, and March 3, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Shake Shack Employee Schedules Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 24, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits hourly employees who worked at New York City Shake Shack restaurants between Jan. 1, 2019, and March 3, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Tyson v. Shake Shack Enterprises LLC, Case No. 514220/2022, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings
See Shake Shack Employee Schedules Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
U.S. Polo Association Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased and did not receive a refund or credit for their purchases from any U.S. Polo Association outlet stores in California between July 12, 2015, and June 24, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the U.S. Polo Association Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 22, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased merchandise from any U.S. Polo Association outlet stores in California between July 12, 2015 and June 24, 2022 and who did not receive a refund or credit for their purchases.
- Case Name & Number: Zhuravleva v. U.S. Outlet Stores LLC, d/b/a U.S. Polo Association, Case No.: 37-2019-00036327-CU-BT-CTL in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego
See U.S. Polo Association Fake Sale Prices Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Genesis Building Services, Eat My Dust Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits all hourly, non-exempt and non-collectively bargained employees of Genesis Building Services and/or Eat My Dust who worked for the companies between Jan. 24, 2016, and Nov. 12, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Genesis Building Services, Eat My Dust Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 19, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits all hourly, non-exempt and non-collectively bargained employees of Genesis Building Services and/or Eat My Dust who worked for the companies between Jan. 24, 2016, and Nov. 12, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Almidia Esteban Melendez, et al. v. Genesis Building Services Inc. and Eat my Dust Inc., et al., Case No. 20-CIV-00453, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo
See Genesis Building Services, Eat My Dust Wage-and-Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers whose personal information was compromised in a PCS Revenue Control Systems data breach between May 19, 2017, and Dec. 19, 2019. You may be eligible for a potential award from the PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: November 23, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers whose personal information was compromised in a PCS Revenue Control Systems data breach between May 19, 2017, and Dec. 19, 2019. An estimated 867,2019 individuals are included under this class definition.
- Case Name & Number: Gamez, et al. v. PCS Revenue Control Systems Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-08991-JXN-AME in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Newark Division
See PCS Revenue Control Systems Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Jame Roll Form Products LLC in Illinois between Aug. 19, 2016, and May 24, 2022, and whose biometric identifiers were collected through fingerprint scan time clocks without the employee giving written consent. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 1, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who worked for Jame Roll Form Products LLC in Illinois between Aug. 19, 2016, and May 24, 2022, and whose biometric identifiers were collected through fingerprint scan time clocks without the employee first giving written consent.
- Case Name & Number: Cruz v. Jame Roll Form Products, Case No. 2021CH04132 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
See Jame Roll Form Products Biometric Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased or leased certain makes of vehicles from a dealer in California between Jan. 1, 2001, and April 30, 2003, and who lived in California as of Nov. 15, 2010. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 31, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who purchased or leased certain make vehicles from a dealer in California between Jan. 1, 2001, and April 30, 2003, and who lived in California as of Nov. 15, 2010. Makes covered by the settlement are Acura, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, GMC, Honda, Hummer, Infiniti, Jaguar, Jeep, Land Rover, Lexus, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan, Oldsmobile, Plymouth, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Toyota and Volvo.the collateral protection insurance carrier or third-party collateral protection insurance administrator.
- Case Name & Number: Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II, JCCP Nos. 4298 and 4303, in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco
See Ford Canada, California Vehicle Dealers Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Carnagio McDonald’s Employee Finger Scan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who had their biometric information collected without written consent by Carnagio when clocking into work in Illinois since Feb. 11, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Carnagio McDonald’s Employee Finger Scan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 26, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who had their biometric information collected by Carnagio when clocking into work in Illinois since Feb. 11, 2014, despite not providing written consent. There are an estimated 1,417 class members included under this definition.
- Case Name & Number: Karikari v. Carnagio Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2019 L 000168, in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois
See Carnagio McDonald’s Employee Finger Scan Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who purchased single-serving K-Cups labeled as recyclable between June 8, 2016, and Aug. 8, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 9, 2023
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who purchased single serving K-Cups labeled as recyclable between June 8, 2016, and Aug. 8, 2022.
- Case Name & Number: Smith v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. Case No. 4:18-CV-06690-HSG in the District Court for the Northern District of California
See Keurig ‘Recyclable’ K-Cups False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Class Action Lawsuit
Facebook has decided to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that they “improperly obtained and collected data from Facebook Users in the United States who visited non-Facebook websites that displayed the Facebook Like button between April 22, 2010 and September 26, 2011, inclusive.” You may be eligible for a potential award from the Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation Class Action Lawsuit.
- Claim Form Deadline: September 22, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits consumers who, between April 22, 2010, and Sept. 26, 2011, inclusive, were Facebook users in the United States who visited non-Facebook websites that displayed the Facebook Like button.
- Case Name & Number: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, Case No. 5:12-MD-02314-EJD in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Facebook Internet Tracking Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who received a fax advertisement from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers between July 14, 2009, and June 9, 2010. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: September 26, 2022
- Who’s Eligible: The FTB settlement benefits LLCs that paid an LLC tax fee based on their worldwide total income previously required under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 17942. Eligible LLCs must have submitted a refund request that was either denied or denied with the opportunity to file a lawsuit under California tax code by Feb. 4, 2010.
- Case Name & Number: Cin-Q Automobiles, Inc., v. Buccaneers Limited Partnership, Case No. 8:13-cv-01592-AEP, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Tampa Division
See Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: December 27, 2022
- Who’s Eligible:The settlement benefits consumers who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms milk products on or before April 27, 2022. The settlement covers milk, ice cream, butter, yogurt and other dairy products from both Fairlife and Fair Oak Farms. A full list of included products is available on the settlement website.
- Case Name & Number: In re fairlife Milk Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2909, Lead Case No. 1:19-cv-03924-RMD-MDW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
See Fairlife Milk Cow Mistreatment Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit!
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits non-exempt employees of Vail Resorts Management Co. and worked primarily at one of its resort of mountain locations during an applicable class period. Class periods vary depending on the state a Class Member worked in, as follows:
- For Class Members employed in Wyoming: Oct. 21, 2010, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Indiana, Ohio, Washington, Minnesota, Vermont, New York, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin and Colorado: Oct. 21, 2014, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in Missouri: Oct. 21, 2015, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in California, Pennsylvania and Utah: Oct. 21, 2016, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members employed in New Hampshire: Oct. 21, 2017, to Oct. 23, 2021
- For Class Members not employed in one of the above identified states: Oct. 21, 2016 to Oct. 23, 2021
- Case Name & Number: Hamilton v. Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership, Case No. SC20210148, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of El Dorado
See Vail Resorts Wage and Hour Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: January 31, 2024 (estimated)
- Who’s Eligible: The settlement benefits individuals who were incarcerated in a New Jersey prison between Jan. 11, 2015, and Oct. 31, 2020 and met any of the following descriptions.
- Case Name & Number: Adam X. v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, Case No. 3:17-cv-00188-FLW-LHG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See New Jersey Incarcerated Students with Disabilities IDEA Violations Class Action Lawsuit
(Click here to file a claim)
FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit
For Washington residents who got charged a tenant screening fee or holding fee by FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, then you are eligible for a potential award from the FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Class Members are Washington state residents who sent in a rental application to FPI Management between April 16, 2016, and Oct. 13, 2021, and paid a tenant screening fee through FPI to the owner of the property, paid a holding deposit through FPI to the property owner, or had a credit report pulled by FPI or another entity acting on its behalf.
- Case Name & Number: Brianna Morris v. FPI Management Inc., Case. No. 2:19-CV-00128-TOR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
See FPI Management Fees Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit
For every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Every U.S. citizen who was a participant in or beneficiary of the Raydon Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan on or after Sep. 30, 2015
- Case Name & Number: Woznicki v. Raydon Corporation et al., Case No. 6:18-cv-02090-WWB-GJK, in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division
See Raydon ERISA Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone in the United States, its territories, and districts who purchased certain McCormick all-natural products between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021. You are eligible for a potential award from the McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: 90 days after the settlement receives final approval
- Who’s Eligible: Individuals who purchased certain McCormick products labeled as “natural” or “all natural” between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 23, 2021.
- Case Name & Number: Holve, et al. v. Mccormick & Co. Inc., Case No. 6:16-cv-06702 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
See McCormick All-Natural Products False Ad Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999. You may be eligible for a potential award from the USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who owns or owned Universal Life 1, Universal Life 2, Universal Life 3, and/or Universal Life 4 life insurance policies issued or administered by USAA Life, or its predecessors in interest, that were in force on or after March 1, 1999, subject to certain important exclusions. The estates of deceased individuals who would have been Class Members also are considered part of the Class.
- Case Name & Number: Spegele, et al. v. USAA Life Insurance Co., Case No. 5:17-cv-967-OLG in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
See USAA Cost of Insurance Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Duke University and UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all natural persons employed as a faculty member by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: All natural persons employed by Duke University or UNC Chapel Hill from Oct. 1, 2001, through Feb. 5, 2018, as a faculty member.
- Case Name & Number: Binotti, et al. v. Duke University, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-470 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Duke University UNC Faculty Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: California residents who purchased the following Neurobrands products for household or personal use, not for resale, between Jan. 1, 2012, and Oct. 15, 2020:
- NeuroSONIC Superfruit Infusion
- NeuroSONIC Orange Passion
- NeuroBLISS White Raspberry
- NeuroBLISS Citrus Berry
- NeuroBLISS Tropical Lychee
- NeuroPROTEIN Watermelon Mint
- NeuroPROTEIN Cherry Vanilla
- NeuroDAILY Tangerine Citrus
- NeuroGASM Passion Fruit
- Case Name & Number: Young, et al. v. Neurobrands LLC, Case No. 4:18-cv-05907-JSW in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
See Neurobrands DL-Malic Acid Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible:
- The Class is defined as anyone who worked for Intelenet America LLC, now known as Teleperformance Business Services US LLC as an hourly home-based call center worker, including, but not limited to, agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Sept. 20, 2015, and June 21, 2021, or as an hourly call center worker in a brick-and-mortar call center, including, but not limited to agents, associates, call center representatives, and travel care professionals, at any point between Jan. 27, 2017, and June 21, 2021.
- The settlement definition of “At-Home Workers” does not include call center workers who work or worked from home temporarily or permanently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the settlement’s definition of “Brick-And-Mortar Workers” does include call center workers who worked from home temporarily or permanently due to COVID-19.
- Case Name & Number: Jasmine C., et al. v. Intelenet America LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-14052-MCA-JAD in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
See Intelenet America OT Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who is or was previously employed by Robert Heath Trucking in California as a truck driver and was paid piece rate by the mile between Aug. 30, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020
- Case Name & Number: Dianne S., et al. v. Robert Heath Trucking Inc., Case No. 19STCV30808 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
See Robert Heath Trucking Wages Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who participated in the plan at any point between Jan. 8, 2014, and April 8, 2021 (the Class Period), including any beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the plan at any time during that period and any alternate payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the plan at any point during that period.
- Case Name & Number: Buescher et. al v. Brenntag, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-00147-JMG in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
See Brenntag Profit Sharing Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from January 21, 2014, through October 20, 2014. You may be eligible for a potential award from the IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Who’s Eligible: Anyone who was a participant in or beneficiary of the IBM 401(k) Plus Plan at any time from Jan. 21, 2014, through Oct. 20, 2014, and whose plan accounts included investments in the IBM Stock Fund.
- Case Name & Number: Larry J., et al. v. Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-03781-WHP in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
See IBM 401(k) Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit
The settlement will benefit all residents of the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions. You may be eligible for a potential award from the Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: none
- Who’s Eligible: Two classes
- TILA Class: Anyone in the United States who entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions within one year prior to the filing of the initial complaint.
- Breach of Contract Class: Anyone in the United States who, during the Class Period, entered into buydown agreements with Wells Fargo in residential real estate mortgage transactions.
- Case Name & Number: Alejandro Carrillo, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
See Wells Fargo Buydown Agreement Class Action Lawsuit Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit
For current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020, you are eligible for a potential award from the Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Current and former Creative Ceilings Inc. employees in California who worked one or more pay periods between Dec. 20, 2018, and Jan. 17, 2020.
- Case Name & Number: Hector S., et al. v. Creative Ceilings Inc., et al., Case No. MSC19-02678 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa
See Creative Ceilings Settles Wage Statement Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit
For individuals who were former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama who own a Terminix-serviced property, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: There is no claim form deadline; however, the settlement fund will expire 12/01/2022.
- Who’s Eligible: Former and existing Terminix customers in Alabama
- Case Name & Number: State of Alabama v. The Terminix International Co. LP, et al., Case No. CV-2020-901368 in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama
See Terminix Alabama Price Increase Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit
For homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus, you are eligible for a potential award from the Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit!
- Claim Form Deadline: N/A
- Who’s Eligible: Homeowners in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania who received notices of debt and possible acceleration on their mortgage loans from Seterus between the applicable dates in each state.
- Case Name & Number: Koepplinger v. Seterus Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00995 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
See Seterus Alleged Unlawful Debt Collection Class Action Lawsuit Review.
(Click here to file a claim)
Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit
If you signed up for a 401(k) plan with Trojan Horse from Jan. 1, 2011 through Sept. 20, 2016 and fear that you and your loved ones may be taken advantage of, you are eligible for a potential award from the Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit.
- Claim Form Deadline: None
- Estimated Amount: Varies
- Case Name & Number: Longo, et al. v. Trojan Horse Ltd., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00418-BO, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
See our Trojan Horse Retirement Plan Class Action Lawsuit Review .
(Click the link above to file your claim)
For individuals that purchased a timeshare from Resort Sales Missouri Inc. or Spinnaker Resorts Inc on or after June 1, 2014, you are eligible for a potential award.
- Claim Form Deadline: The deadline to file a claim is 30 days after receiving a notice in the mail
- Estimated Amount: Varies, depending on the closing costs paid.
- Case Name & Number: Darrell and Kathleen Thompson v. Resort Sales Missouri Inc. and Spinnaker Resorts Inc., Case No. 1746-CC00203, in the Circuit Court of Taney County, Missouri
See our Missouri Timeshare Closing Costs Lawsuit Review
(Click the link above to file your claim)
Bottom Line
If you qualify for any of these class action lawsuit settlements, this is a great way to earn some extra cash and become reimbursed.
There are many class action lawsuit settlements available up to date, but these are generally available to the public and require no proof of purchase.
If you’re interested in more class action lawsuit settlements, see our full list of the Review.
Did you know you can earn free money from banks? Below are a few of the best banks offering the best bonuses:
- Huntington Bank Promotions
- Chase Bank Promotions
- TD Bank Promotions
- Discover Bank Promotions
- HSBC Bank Promotions
- CIT Bank Promotions
- For more of a variety, see our list of 1,000+ bank bonuses!
Love your website- my go to
Please add me to your email list!
Thank you!
-J-
Please add me to your email list.
Thank you.
Add me
Matt Malmon
Please add me, thank you
Matt